Anna Korwin-Piotrowska’s statement that the Constitutional Tribunal is “already working” is a significant turn in Poland’s Tribunal crisis, but it is not yet proof that the body can make collective decisions again. That proof needs to come through public, checkable institutional acts.
In a statement on 2 November, Korwin-Piotrowska said preparations were under way for a Constitutional Tribunal general assembly scheduled for 3 November at 15:30. She also said that every judge currently holding office could enter the Tribunal, according to Polsat News. That matters after a dispute over the institution’s practical control. But preparations are not the same thing as a formally held meeting or a functioning decision-making process.
The test should be precise. Did the general assembly formally take place? Who participated? What procedural basis was made public? And did the Tribunal show observable movement in its casework? TVN24 reported that Korwin-Piotrowska published a list of 1,171 unresolved cases, more than 700 of which had not been given any procedural course. One meeting cannot clear that backlog. Yet an institution claiming to be operational should, over time, be able to show trackable steps in handling it.
The political conflict is still widening. Polsat News reported opposition calls for the government’s resignation, an investigative commission and a notification to prosecutors. Those are political demands, not evidence that the Tribunal can now function. Former prime minister Leszek Miller and former Tribunal president Jerzy Stępień voiced support for Korwin-Piotrowska’s actions, describing them as an effort to restore order or as necessary. But the available RSS reports do not include the full orders, assembly papers or an independent legal ruling. They cannot establish which legal interpretation of the dispute is binding.
Our view is that “Tribunal is already working” should mark the beginning of a verifiable process, not the end of scrutiny. The immediate issue to watch is not another round of declarations, but whether the general assembly is formally held, under disclosed rules, and followed by visible procedural action on pending cases.
Sources
- TVN24 · Source date: 2026-11-02
- Polsat News · Source date: 2026-11-02
- Polsat News · Source date: 2026-11-02
- Polsat News · Source date: 2026-11-02
- Polsat News · Source date: 2026-11-02
Independent editorial content. WUA is not affiliated with any political party. 2026-11-03
1,171 pending cases at Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal: how to test the claim it is working again