Eight Constitutional Tribunal judges did meet on 3 November and, according to Polish media reports, found that they had a quorum to act, including on a resolution concerning the Tribunal’s 2027 budget proposal. That is a more concrete development than the earlier plan to hold an assembly. It is not, however, proof that Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal procedural crisis has been settled.
Polsat News reported that eight people attended the assembly, although its earlier account said that 12 people were entitled to take part. Its later report said the gathering found a quorum for an effective resolution on the 2027 budget proposal. The reported development is therefore specific: the assembly convened and dealt with a budget matter, rather than merely promising to restore the institution’s work.
The remaining dispute is no longer only about whether judges could enter the building or hold a meeting. It is whether an eight-member gathering could validly determine its own quorum and adopt resolutions. The available reports contain conflicting public assessments. Sławomir Mentzen challenged the way the membership was counted, while Professor Marcin Matczak described the situation as a precedent that could have consequences. Those are attributed interventions in a public argument, not an independent legal ruling.
The strongest case for treating the meeting as progress is also clear. If judges elected by the Sejm have begun working, the Tribunal needs to be able to perform basic institutional tasks; allowing a dispute over its composition to prevent every action can prolong paralysis. But a clearly demonstrated quorum is precisely what must support those actions if their authority is to extend beyond competing political claims.
Later on 3 November, Donald Tusk said he had proposed a meeting with President Karol Nawrocki on the Tribunal dispute. Such talks could reduce political tension. They cannot substitute for documents explaining the legal basis for the quorum adopted at the assembly.
The next issue is concrete: whether official materials will make it possible to independently assess the participating membership, the counting rule and the effect of the resolutions taken on 3 November.
Sources
- Polsat News · Source date: 2026-11-03
- Polsat News · Source date: 2026-11-03
- Polsat News · Source date: 2026-11-03
- TVN24 · Source date: 2026-11-03
Independent editorial content. WUA is not affiliated with any political party. 2026-11-04